Frequently Asked Questions
Why are different MuA variants recommended for in vitro vs in vivo applications?
v.2 MuA and v.3 MuA are distinct hyperactive mutants optimized for different environments. The distinction is not due to differences in Mu end sequences or cofactors. Instead, each variant has been selected to perform optimally under the specific reaction conditions required for in vitro or in vivo workflows.
Which MuA performs best with modified Mu ends?
For in vitro applications involving engineered or modified Mu ends, v.2 MuA significantly outperforms wild-type MuA in internal comparison data. This makes it an excellent choice for demanding in vitro workflows such as cloning, library construction, and experiments involving non-standard Mu ends.